dave sag writes:
>We state
>
> 4. The term pronoic should be used to endorse and promote products derived
> from this software before obtaining written permission. For written
> permission, you must contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave, we have been asked to approve polit
This thread highlights the risks of asking -- and answering -- specific
legal questions on license discuss. This is particularly true in the
esoteric field of export control, although my warning applies generally.
Attorneys should not give specific legal advice in a general forum in
which there
There's one more level of complexity in re US Export compliance which
this discussion has overlooked (probably because of the specific nature
of the question).
IMHO, BXA rules are set up with the assumption that the software in
question is being developed in a proprietary way. When they refer to
Bernard Nyman wrote:
> I am acting for a UK-based book publisher that is proposing to publish
> a book for programmers concerning a particular Adobe design software
> product and they want to include a tryout version of the software on a
> CD to be distributed with the book. Adobe have agr
4 matches
Mail list logo
