"Free Software Foundation Announces Support of the Affero General
Public License, the First Copyleft License for Web Services"
http://www.fsf.org/press/2002-03-19-Affero.html
I think clause Affero GPL 2(d) provides for the propagation of
"badgeware", meaning that it obligates propagation of a b
"Free Software Foundation Announces Support of the Affero General
Public License, the First Copyleft License for Web Services"
http://www.fsf.org/press/2002-03-19-Affero.html
(NOTE: The FSF suggests comments to them. I CC'ed them, but
I'd prefer discussion in a forum. license-discuss seems
Larry:
Thank you for your insightful comments. Your acknowledgement that there
may be reasons to merge the BSD and MIT licenses, is greatly
appreciated. Please note that our intent was that this license be
unrestricted as I believe was the intent in the MIT and BSD licenses.
When we embarked a
Dave,
Here's the scoop from Lucent Legal...
> Lucent has made a policy decision not to seek third party
> approvals of any of our licensing agreements.
Hopefully, you can live with the current license. It was drafted to
be as close to open source as Lucent's internal IP practices would allow.
Ok. I present general public excuses for my
prompt response, included to Mr Stallman.
This kind of happening is somehow superfluous, and
helps nobody to understand the true questions.
I will retain myself from any message till
next Sunday at least.
Thanks for all, I am sorry because the noi
> I was responding to this text, written by someone in this discussion
> (I don't know who, but it isn't crucial).
Uh ! Mr Stallman, I wonder if you are saying either you have
nothing to say or that you prefer to talk with some spirits.
You can name me, I have a name.
> Describing software as
6 matches
Mail list logo
