Re: open source applications with closed source components

On Monday, July 15, 2002, at 03:30 PM, Bruce Dodson wrote: > Do your recipients have permission to distribute the two closed-source > frameworks freely with their apps? For the sake of argument, lets say that the closed-source frameworks have to be purchased by the user. So, to run the binary

copyleft lite? - rev 3

Thanks for the feedback so far! By "without fee" I meant that were not imposing a fee; this was confusing and unnecessary so I removed it. I see what you meant meant about the "rights not specifically granted are reserved" being superfluous. I've removed it for now, but might add it back. Not

Re: open source applications with closed source components

Do your recipients have permission to distribute the two closed-source frameworks freely with their apps? -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

open source applications with closed source components

I have an application whose source code is available under a BSD license. It contains 4 frameworks. 2 are open source under BSD. 2 are closed source, but I have permission to distribute them freely with my app. Does my application conform to the OSI definition of open source? Also, how sh

Re: OOPS License 0.1 (GPL compatibility)

>On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 00:16:02 0200 Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote. >"Gerjon de Vries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Additionally, I have added terms to allow relicensing under the GPL. > >Some people believe that Choice-of-law clauses are incompatible with >the GPL. The OOPSL allows