RE: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread Lawrence E. Rosen
What happens if you, in the USA, prepare a derivative work based on two OSL licensed pieces of code, one from, say, Taiwan, and the other from France. You are obligated under two licenses, one from the licensor in Taiwan and the other from the licensor in France. Nothing unusual here with

Re: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread Bjorn Reese
Henry Pijffers wrote: However, suppose big US company didn't register to do business anywhere in Europe, and just licensed some open source software to me through the Internet, and later decides to change their mind, then how can I defend my rights on anything I did with their software

Re: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread David Woolley
You are obligated under two licenses, one from the licensor in Taiwan and the other from the licensor in France. Nothing unusual here with respect to the OSL. Two licenses with different effective terms; there is not one OSL, but one for each of the 100+ countries in the world. It means

RE: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread Lawrence E. Rosen
From: Larry Rosen You are obligated under two licenses, one from the licensor in Taiwan and the other from the licensor in France. Nothing unusual here with respect to the OSL. From: David Woolley [mailto:david;djwhome.demon.co.uk] Two licenses with different effective terms;

Re: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread David Woolley
think the terms of the OSL are different, or will be interpreted differently, in those other countries? It is true that the OSL -- and The fact that you said that the choice of law was determined by the licensor; if it is unlikely to change, there will be less uncertainty for licensees if it

RPL 1.1--How do we do to move forward here.

2002-11-07 Thread Randall Burns
Last Month, I posted the attached new iteration of the Reciprocal Public License(version 1.1). There were some criticisms of this license that were made, but I don't think anything showed that the conditions in the RPL were outside the OSI guidelines. What do we need to do to get approval on

Re: Approval Requested for AFL 1.2 and OSL 1.1

2002-11-07 Thread Bruce Dodson
The amount of damages that courts would award might vary considerably from one jurisdiction to the next, even if the license is interpreted exactly the same way. Without naming any names wink, some countries are just more litigious than others; some courts, more punitive. - Original Message

Re: Express and implied warranties in software licenses

2002-11-07 Thread Bruce Dodson
Thank you very much for clearing up my FUD. Well, I have never hidden the fact that I'm no legal scholar, and this is proof once again that a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. I can only speak for myself, but between this and the discussions we had privately, I'm finally comfortable