CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL EMAIL LOTTERY
FROM:INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT
Ref. Number: OGS/2311786008/01
Batch Number: 14/011/IPD
RE:WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE
We are pleased to inform you of the result of the Lottery Winners International
programs held on the 1st January, 2003.
CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL EMAIL LOTTERY
FROM:INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT
Ref. Number: OGS/2311786008/01
Batch Number: 14/011/IPD
RE:WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE
We are pleased to inform you of the result of the Lottery Winners International
programs held on the 1st January, 2003.
CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL EMAIL LOTTERY
FROM:INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION/PRIZE AWARD DEPT
Ref. Number: OGS/2311786008/01
Batch Number: 14/011/IPD
RE:WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE
We are pleased to inform you of the result of the Lottery Winners International
programs held on the 1st January, 2003.
Hi folks,
What are the implications of trademark ownership regarding Open Source
software? Say, for example, that I produce --
HappySoft[tm] -- A program promoting happiness
and I reserve www.happysoft.org, and make a cool logo, and my Java package
names (or C++ namespaces) start with --
Quoting Ihab Awad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What are the implications of trademark ownership regarding Open Source
> software?
Less than you might think.
[You register and use HappySoft as a trademark in a particular field for
a particular piece of software, and publish statements like:]
> Hap
OK, first, IANAL, TINLA, TSNBCAUPL. (I am not a lawyer,
this is not legal advice, this should not be construed
as unlicensed practice of law).
What I offer is business commentary, that is, what I
would do in my business in these circumstances, or
what I would advise my business consulting clients
Hi Ihab,
A trademark is not a privilege to take a word out of the language, to
prevent people from uttering that word in their source code or on their
entirely different kinds of products, or when comparing their software
to the trademark owner's software. A trademark is just a word, name,
symbol
Quoting myself:
> My recollection is that the legal standard applicable to trademarks is
> that infringing use must tend to create such confusion _not_ in the mind
> of a "reasonably prudent" customer.
Cancel that word "not". Edit error -- sorry.
--
Cheers, find / -user your -name b
Hello,
With the great danger to step on a very old subject, I would like to
ask weather people have experience connecting GPL software to MPL
software? As I am not a lawyer, I understand using GPL software
from within MPL software only requires permission from the GPL
author?
Thnx for replying,
9 matches
Mail list logo
