Quoting Paul Guyot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I don't like (and don't use) vacation messages either, but I think
> that the good ones (not them all unfortunately) test if there is a
> Precedence: bulk header, and this list (software?) doesn't provide
> such a header.
While that's certainly quite t
À (At) 2:37 -0800 24/12/03, Karsten M. Self écrivait (wrote) :
It's generally considered inconsiderate, not to mention an indiscrete
advertisement of a potentially vacant house, to allow 'vacation'
autoresponses to list mail.
I've received over a half-dozen of same in response to my most recent
pos
It's generally considered inconsiderate, not to mention an indiscrete
advertisement of a potentially vacant house, to allow 'vacation'
autoresponses to list mail.
I've received over a half-dozen of same in response to my most recent
post to this list. I'd strongly encourage subscribers to double-
on Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:33:10PM -0700, Alex Rousskov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for an OSI-certified, short, permissive,
> non-viral, MIT/BSD/Apache-style license with the "Integrity of The
> Author's Source Code" clause[1] that prohibits source-code from being
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
