--- "Lawrence E. Rosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly do you mean by
> > "bare trademark license"? Can you give me some hints on what
> > to read up on?
>
> Just a few hints. I don't have time to give comprehensive lega
Hello,
Intending to use the following license for LAB Project, I need your advice and
discussion about.
It is an adapted version of http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cuaoffice.php
modified to comply with both USA, French and EEC regulations. Only some minor
formulations and definitions change
James Michael DuPont wrote:
> Sorry for my late reply, I just noticed that today.
> Please excuse my ignorance, but what exactly do you mean by
> "bare trademark license"? Can you give me some hints on what
> to read up on?
Just a few hints. I don't have time to give comprehensive legal answers
--- "Lawrence E. Rosen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bare trademark license is not allowed under trademark law. This
> license is
> the easiest way to lose the DotGNU service mark.
>
> /Larry Rosen
Larry,
Sorry for my late reply, I just noticed that today.
Please excuse my ignorance, but what
4 matches
Mail list logo
