On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:50:14PM -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:38:04AM -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
> >>
> >> Thus in general I think one is generally better off talking with
> >> upstream projects and trying to ge
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:38:04AM -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>> Thus in general I think one is generally better off talking with
>> upstream projects and trying to get them on board.
>
> Take the most restrictive reasonable interpretation
Quoting Clark C. Evans (c...@clarkevans.com):
> You are being unnecessarily argumentative.
Alas, you have missed the central thrust of what I said. I was attempting
to account for the general lack of interest in assisting analysing your
problem as defined -- speaking for myself, but I suspect
Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
> And with regard to this irrational fear of the reach of the GPL
> regarding functional linking that is but one minor factor in a complex
> derivative work analysis, what is the risk that some court will force
> me to disclose my *copyright-independent* crown jewel propri
Chad Perrin wrote:
> Take the most restrictive reasonable interpretation of both if you want
> to play it safe.
That's true as far as it goes but leaves out the fun part of the analysis.
The evaluation of risk -- particularly legal risk -- involves the analysis
of many factors. Sometimes "the most
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 03:38:04AM -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
>
> Thus in general I think one is generally better off talking with
> upstream projects and trying to get them on board.
Take the most restrictive reasonable interpretation of both if you want
to play it safe. After all, a change in
Quoting Chris Travers (ch...@metatrontech.com):
> Good for you (I mean that). As I say in the LedgerSMB project we hold
> API's (however invoked) to be freely usable with the minor exception
> that inheritance probably crosses the line into derivative works land
> (because once inheritance is muc
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> Rick Moen wrote:
>> You know, Clark: Speaking for myself, I have no interest in advising
>> querents about how closely they can lawfully skirt the requirements of
>> copyleft licences, or how they can creatively circumvent those
>> requirem
8 matches
Mail list logo
