On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> I exited, Bruce.
>
> You talk to the gentleman if you wish. I left.
I'm done as well. Ben Tilly's response made sense to me.
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://pro
Quoting Bruce Perens (br...@perens.com):
> Is this really a serious discussion?
I exited, Bruce.
You talk to the gentleman if you wish. I left.
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mail
On 09/07/2012 11:24 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
I don't think you are approaching this discussion with a serious attitude,
attention to the subject, and/or a sense of perspective.
Is this really a serious discussion?
It sounds to me more like a contest of how many silly things some of us
can get awa
Quoting Ben Reser (b...@reser.org):
> Depending on the license that may not be so easy.
[...]
Ben, I was not giving you a very serious reply (but rather a dismissive
one), because frankly I don't think you are approaching this discussion
with a serious attitude, attention to the subject, and/or a
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ben Tilly wrote:
> The location of the license text is not a provision of the license.
> Some licenses, for instance the GPL, actually say that you have to
> distribute the license along with the work. Others leave the matter
> silent. Either way the license is a
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
[...]
>>> For that matter is it not also a violation of the technology neutral
>>> clause of the open source definition?
>>
>> No. Read it.
>
> I did. If you only provide a URL to read the lice
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Card catalogue? Help from a librarian?
Depending on the license that may not be so easy. I doubt there is
just a book of open source licenses. So you're likely going to have
to find some other book that includes the license. If it's not a
co
7 matches
Mail list logo
