Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Gwyn Murray
Seconding Richard's comments regarding the usefulness of the alphabetical list here. G. On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote: >> 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The "Open Source Licensing" page (replacing the >> current http://op

Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Luis Villa
Happy to take suggestions on the "in essence" part- trying to capture the basics in one sentence. On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote: >> 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The "Open Source Licensing" page (replacing the >> curr

Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Richard Fontana
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote: > 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The "Open Source Licensing" page (replacing the > current http://opensource.org/licenses/) would say (hopefully all > changes self-explanatory): > > " > Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the Open

[License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

2012-11-11 Thread Luis Villa
Hi, all- This is a deliberately small, unambitious proposal to simplify and improve how the OSI-approved licenses are presented on the OSI website. The goal of the proposal is to make http://opensource.org/licenses/ more useful for newcomers who are trying to learn about open source licensing and