Sorry, I left out a crucial word:
> As I said, I for one consider such badge-on-every-UI-screen licensing to
> effectively violate OSD #6 (discrimination against fields of
> endeavour), in that the every-UI-screen requirement cripples third-party
> competing use.
^ commercial
As I said
Quoting David Woolley (for...@david-woolley.me.uk):
> Eitan Adler wrote:
> >On 24 December 2012 22:10, ldr ldr wrote:
> >>John: I'd be happy with proprietary forks, as long as the Attribution
> >>provision would hold.
> >>
> >>E.g.: if they sell it to other people, those other people still are
>
John Funnell scripsit:
> I believe it should be possible to restrict usage via copyright
> license conditions just as it is possible to restrict almost anything.
> E.g. I could put a clause that says licensee must be vegetarian.
> Anyone eating meat would not have copyright license benefits and co
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, John Funnell wrote:
When a user makes their first copy, their acceptance of the
anti-patent license is also an agreement to the restrictions on usage.
If a US person violates this by entering into an agreement for a
limited-scope patent license, they violate their original co
When a user makes their first copy, their acceptance of the
anti-patent license is also an agreement to the restrictions on usage.
If a US person violates this by entering into an agreement for a
limited-scope patent license, they violate their original copyright
license and are thus not allowed to
5 matches
Mail list logo
