On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Prashant Shah writes:
>>I am submitting final draft for a software license called Akshar
>>License for review on this list.
>>
>>https://github.com/octabrain/akshar/blob/master/LICENSE-1.0.txt
>>
>>https://raw.github.com/octabrain/akshar/master
Prashant Shah scripsit:
> Mainly it differs from Apache License 2.0 in sections 3 (patent grants
> to derivative works) and 4 (more relaxed terms)
In detail:
In clause 3, the words "or derivative works" has been struck, so there no
patent license on derivative works you make yourself and do not
Prashant Shah writes:
>I am submitting final draft for a software license called Akshar
>License for review on this list.
>
>https://github.com/octabrain/akshar/blob/master/LICENSE-1.0.txt
>
>https://raw.github.com/octabrain/akshar/master/LICENSE-1.0.txt
>
>Mainly it differs from Apache License 2.
johann Sorel writes:
>I am not in the usa but in Europe, public domain is not yet really
>legal' like you said.
>Yet there are so much initiatives using one of CCO/PD/BOLA/WTFPL that
>public domain is a 'De Facto'. The only people who have problems with
>it are governments and lawyer
>they will ha
Quoting David Woolley (for...@david-woolley.me.uk):
> There are no international conventions on public domain, so a public
> domain declaration in one country may not have any effect in
> another, whereas a copyright one would.
[...]
> You would be much better advised to use a short licence that
I am not in the usa but in Europe, public domain is not yet really 'legal' like
you said.
Yet there are so much initiatives using one of CCO/PD/BOLA/WTFPL that
public domain is a 'De Facto'. The only people who have problems with it are
governments and lawyer
they will have to accept it eventua
Hello,
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
My concern is o
Hi everyone,
I am submitting final draft for a software license called Akshar
License for review on this list.
https://github.com/octabrain/akshar/blob/master/LICENSE-1.0.txt
https://raw.github.com/octabrain/akshar/master/LICENSE-1.0.txt
Mainly it differs from Apache License 2.0 in sections 3 (
Alejandro Antonio Loyola Ruiz wrote:
I have a question: what are the steps performed by Open Source to
consider a license as open source software?
http://opensource.org/approval
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should
johann Sorel wrote:
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
* Alejandro Antonio Loyola Ruiz [2013-05-02
22:52]:
> I have a question: what are the steps performed by Open Source to consider
> a license as open source software?
Please see this page: http://opensource.org/approval
And: http://opensource.org/docs/osd
Martin
--
Martin Michlmayr
Open Sourc
good afternoon
I have a question: what are the steps performed by Open Source to consider
a license as open source software?
--
*Alejandro Loyola Ruiz*
*Asesoría informática, **Asesoría e **instalación*
* de redes y** mantenimiento ** *
*
Hello,
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
My concern is on
13 matches
Mail list logo
