Nirk Niggler asked:
> I realize including the entire contents is repetitive, but is there
> an official statement or court case that would justify merely
> saying MIT rather than including the full license?
Is there an official statement or court case that would justify going 56 MPH
in
Chuck, thanks for your reply.
I definitely have seen many people just follow option (2) but my current
understanding is that it is actually unacceptable for MIT license
(regardless of how many people do it).
GPL, for example, goes out of the way to say that it is permissible to
indicate "how to v
2 matches
Mail list logo
