Re: [License-discuss] License compatibility - reg

2013-06-27 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Ben Tilly (bti...@gmail.com): [Snipping the recap and same old, same old] > There is actually good reason to pay attention to the FSF on this > issue. Ahem. Well, I have great respect for many of the people in FSF, but they have a long history of asserting what they would like to be the

Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] License compatibility - reg

2013-06-27 Thread N. Satyanarayana
Hi, I am extremely sorry for posting this on license-review list earlier. Hence, the discussion is being moved to this list as suggested. We are releasing the code developed by us under GPLv2.0 with dynamic download for packages released under different licenses as given below. So, the package co

Re: [License-discuss] License compatibility - reg

2013-06-27 Thread Ben Tilly
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Ben Tilly (bti...@gmail.com): > >> According to my recollection, she was definitely of the opinion that >> her statements about whether the license should be enforceable at all >> helped sway the judge to the position that it should be.