Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com launched.

2013-08-20 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Engel Nyst (engel.n...@gmail.com): > Please allow me to ask the impossible question: how would you write > the summary of GPLv3 vs GPLv2 in 8-16 words? 'I have written a truly remarkable comparison, which, alas, this margin is too small to contain.'

Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com launched.

2013-08-20 Thread Pamela Chestek
On 8/19/2013 1:48 PM, Engel Nyst wrote: Hello license-discuss, Please allow me to ask the impossible question: how would you write the summary of GPLv3 vs GPLv2 in 8-16 words? No need to be so parsimonious -- the current blurb is 44 words. Pam Pamela S. Chestek, Esq. Chestek Legal PO Box 24

Re: [License-discuss] Open source license chooser choosealicense.com launched.

2013-08-20 Thread Richard Fontana
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:48:06PM +0300, Engel Nyst wrote: > Hello license-discuss, > > On 08/18/2013 04:38 AM, Richard Fontana wrote: > >Independent of this point, I'm concerned about inaccurate statements > >made on the choosealicense.com site (one that we talked about was the > >assertion that

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Lawrence Rosen
John Cowan wrote: > Of course, the more such reassurances you add, the more complexity > and uncertainty you interject into the situation: "the price of infinite > precision is infinite verbosity", as we say in Lojbanistan, and adding > more terms, while helpful to the sympathetic, just provides

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Lawrence Rosen
John Cowan correctly observed: > ... there is no escape from the dreaded ยง 203(a)(5), which explicitly > says that you can't contract out of it. Section 203(a) is only a *conditional* termination. The licensor must take affirmative steps within a designated and brief period of time [1] to exercis

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread John Cowan
Lawrence Rosen scripsit: > Indeed I wish I were, like your father, paid by the word. Or paid > by any other measure here Eh? He was paid by the semester by the New Jersey taxpayers. His articles weren't paid for at all. Are you googling the wrong Tom Cowan? > Thanks for playing Huxley

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Lawrence Rosen
John Cowan protested: > Eh? [John's father] was paid by the semester by the New Jersey taxpayers. > His articles weren't paid for at all. Are you googling the wrong Tom Cowan? Unfortunately I didn't Google at all. I just did Google that name, though, and found one of his name, also a lawyer, wh

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Richard Stallman
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider [ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, [ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. In principle, this should be a free software license as far as I can see. It would cal

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Eben" == Eben Moglen writes: Eben> Whatever the truth of the adage may be, the point for us is that none Eben> of this has anything to do with licensing. Fred Trotter was actually Eben> asking a question, to which the correct answer is: "You don't need a Eben> license to make someth

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

2013-08-20 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Eben" == Eben Moglen writes: Eben> No, Mr Cowan. The license only exists if the precedent license hasn't Eben> been terminated or revoked during the term. If it has, then the right Eben> to distribute under free license has also terminated. No one should Eben> take the code in r