[License-discuss] UNSUBSCRIBE

I want to unsubscribe this mailing list! Thanks for all the infos of this valuable list I got whilst I have been a member. I do wish You all good luck in evaluating all those different choices of opensource Licences available now! Sincerely, Thomas Schneider PS: when there is another means n

Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license.

Why don't you feel that http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT meets this need? On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Buck Golemon wrote: > Apologies for the previous message. > I fat-fingered the send button before finishing my revision. > > --- > There's a gap that CC0 and the Unlicense have attempted

Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license.

Apologies for the previous message. I fat-fingered the send button before finishing my revision. --- There's a gap that CC0 and the Unlicense have attempted to fill, which is still not covered by any OSI approved license. Are any of you willing (and able) to attempt to fill this gap? I believe th

[License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license.

There's a gap that CC0 and the Unlicense have attempted to fill, which is still not covered by any OSI approved license. Are any of you willing (and able) to attempt to fill this gap? I believe the first step would be to agree on a (short!) list of minimum requirements. My own requirements: 1) T