The concurrence's language on 101 is indeed very strong, although not
binding; and would appear to thread the needle in a way that allows the few
genuinely innovative software patents while throwing out the vast majority
of them — an approach the Supreme Court had called for but not provided
much g
On 17/11/14 15:02, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
> As long as the core vote counting and verification bits are open source
> and can be externally verified then one vendor providing more vote
> planning aids, analytics, financial tracking and collaboration tools are
> part of their comprehensive suite as
Gerv,
Without knowing how OSET intends to design their software or what vendors
provide today it¹s hard for me to say.
As long as the core vote counting and verification bits are open source
and can be externally verified then one vendor providing more vote
planning aids, analytics, financial tra
On 14/11/14 19:55, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
> In our case the majority of the software being evaluated for open
> sourcing is framework and utility functions that we believe would
> provide value to our community. We wish to insure that this framework
> remains open source and commonly used but that
4 matches
Mail list logo
