Hi there,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Ben Cotton
wrote:
> I'm curious as to the intent of this clause. If you're distributing the
> software binary-only and not making source code available, then it's not
> open source regardless of whether that clause is included. If you are
> providing so
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Engel Nyst wrote:
> On 01/16/2015 07:44 AM, Zluty Sysel wrote:
> > "Reverse engineering, decompilation, and/or disassembly of software
> > provided in binary form under this license is prohibited."
>
> I'm wondering why you want this clause. Is the software in sou
2 matches
Mail list logo