On 08/06/2015 9:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would agree that this effort should be done, but only provided that
there is evidence that things are currently broken. I don't think
it's quite fair forcing people into busy work to fix something that
isn't broken.
Broken is a strong word. But we
On 05/06/2015 12:28 PM, Weston Davis wrote:
However, we would add a criteria targeted at preventing code under
the class of licenses from being orphaned. (This may, for example,
be addressed in candidate licenses by explicitly allowing
re-licensing under other well-known licenses.)
This seems
2 matches
Mail list logo
