Re: [License-discuss] Is what's made with Open Source, Open Source?

2015-06-12 Thread Gareth Edwards
Hey many thanks Max, This is all really helpful - as you can imagine I'm trying to understand this as fully as I can... Over on my Reddit post (http://redd.it/39gpcy) there's a reply that as Rapid is a server platform it doesn't get distributed like a typical desktop application so GPLv3

Re: [License-discuss] Is what's made with Open Source, Open Source?

2015-06-12 Thread gareth.edwa...@rapid-is.co.uk
Thanks John, You'll be pleased (as am I) that all of Rapid runs nicely under IcedTea! Now I'm just grappling with the extent of the linking that a Rapid app has to the platform... Gareth - Reply message - From: co...@ccil.org To: license-discuss@opensource.org Cc:

Re: [License-discuss] Is what's made with Open Source, Open Source?

2015-06-12 Thread Lawrence Rosen
Gareth, it all depends on what is a work based on the Program. See GPLv2 ยง0, part of which is copied below. Opinions on that definition differ. Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the

Re: [License-discuss] Is what's made with Open Source, Open Source?

2015-06-12 Thread cowan
Gareth Edwards scripsit: And this is where Rapid apps get tricky. The debate (I think) is can a Rapid app exist, like my essay, independently of the Rapid platform used to make it? (like FileZilla can exist outside of the mysys compiler) And the answer is, no it can't. The critical question

Re: [License-discuss] Is what's made with Open Source, Open Source?

2015-06-12 Thread Gervase Markham
On 11/06/15 20:53, Gareth Edwards wrote: Over on my Reddit post (http://redd.it/39gpcy) there's a reply that as Rapid is a server platform it doesn't get distributed like a typical desktop application so GPLv3 doesn't apply, and AGPLv3 should be used instead. Well, it depends what you want to