Larry,
Scenario A: I'm looking for an example in my codebase on how to do Foo (of
course) and I find a code snippet to do roughly what I want. I cut and paste
it into where I need it, modify it slightly and move on. Developers do this
all the time.
If the source code for the Category B mod
Richard Eckart de Castilho scripsit:
> "This software is provided under the terms of the GPL *as long
> as mandated by the reciprocal terms of libraries used by this
> software*. Any code removed from this software falls back to ASL unless
> it continues to depend on GPL code. Likewise, all code a
Hi all,
I am relatively new here, yet this seems to be the most appropriate venue to
ask a question that has been nagging me for a while now.
I'm involved in a project that consists of multiple modules, most are ASL
licensed, but some are GPL licensed.
The reason why we use GPL for a few modul
Responding to Nigel Tzeng's concerns (below) about source and object code:
There is perhaps a smaller risk that someone will make a derivative work of
Apache software entirely by accident from the binary alone without looking
for the source code (and finding it) posted on the web. But just in c
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this, if not I'd greatly
appreciate a pointer to the right one.
So I ran into a situation where a company isn't training their employees
very well and is causing all sorts of confusion and in some cases outright
license/copyright violations through what
I wrote earlier and want to postscript it:
> A bigger change would require that someone intelligent on the PMC
> evaluate it as a contribution and make a comment about it in the NOTICE
file.
For example, a short and simple NOTICE file could say:
Apache SQRT is an improved square root calc
Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
The problem with reciprocal licenses in the lines of EPL and MPL is not so
much in being used as:
a) a *library* or as
b) a clearly *separate piece of code* (that resides in a repository outside
the ASF)
but rather in *accepting patches* for at least two reason
7 matches
Mail list logo