Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
> What non-GPL things are you talking about?
Insofar as I can reconstruct my thinking of last night (post in
haste, repent at leisure), I was thinking of the ordinary proprietary
opt-out clause letting you incorporate Yoyodyne's library into your
binary-only program. I
John Cowan replied in response to Pam Chestek's comment:
> Consider a work available under GPL+proprietary terms, where you get to do
> non-GPL things if you have paid. Then it would not be enough to show that
> the work was available under a proprietary license to allow you to download
> it
2 matches
Mail list logo
