>
> So, of course you can, irrespective of what Nigel suggested,
> redistribute RHEL without a trademark license from Red Hat. _And_ all
> of the software is open source.
>
>
Case in point, CentOS did it for *years* before RH started sponsoring them.
JD
>
>
__
One observation on this whole topic.
The OSD is a checklist for evaluating licenses as open source, rather than
a guide to the available freedoms of the software to which it is applied,
even if in most cases those are close to the same thing.
To Larry's raising of OSD 7: it has to be taken in tha
Quoting Ben Tilly (bti...@gmail.com):
> Item 1 of the OSD says, "The license shall not restrict any party from
> selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software
> distribution containing programs from several different sources. The
> license shall not require a royalty
3 matches
Mail list logo
