Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > What's the "right" level to scan at? Top-level project-declared LICENSE > file? Or per-file throughout the tree? (Note that often those two measures > don't agree with each other.) MO is that the right level is scan at both levels

Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:57 AM Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM Philippe Ombredanne > > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:07 AM Luis Villa

Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Smith, McCoy wrote: > But I think that at some point it would be helpful for there to be a > resource for people to sift through all the licenses on the list to > understand what they do and don’t do. You may also consider this

Re: [License-discuss] notes on a systematic approach to "popular" licenses

> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:19 PM Philippe Ombredanne > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Luis Villa wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:07 AM Luis Villa wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey, all- >> >> I promised some board members a summary of my