Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

In military contracting , patent grants are key to the point where I wouldn't consider a non patent granting license from, say, lockheed as being open source at all. On Aug 18, 2016 3:05 PM, "Tzeng, Nigel H." wrote: > On 8/18/16, 3:57 PM, "License-discuss on behalf of

Re: [License-discuss] Shortest copyleft licence

The wtfpl both isn't copyleft, nor is it a valid copyright license for software. On Mar 30, 2015 4:23 PM, jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote: On 30/03/15 07:40, Tim Makarios wrote Publication Licence [1], which a more careful (automated) word-count measures at nearly 800 words. Isn't

Re: [License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development

Ghostscript is now AGPLd, for what its worth... On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Lawrence Rosen lro...@rosenlaw.com wrote: Fred Trotter wrote: First, I would like for the OSI and FSF people on this list to consider some kind of new status for a license, like OSI tolerated or OSI Not Open