Mário Amado Alves wrote:
Mark Rafn wrote:
Fundamentally, if the client is open-source, it can be
modified, and the
modified version can LIE and say it's the original version. Anything
which prevents this is not open-source.
?!
Many (most?, all?) open source licenses require
Ryo Chijiiwa wrote:
Hi,
I'm the author of a PHP-based webmail client called IlohaMail
(http://ilohamail.org) currently released under the GPL, and am
considering offering my software under a license that would maintain its
free (as in speech) nature but not necessarily be free (as in beer) in
Russell Nelson wrote:
I'm going to propose a change the Open Source Definition at our board
meeting next Thursday. It is simply this:
0) A license may not restrict use or modification of a lawfully
obtained copy of a work.
Anybody have problems with this? Does this have any problems?
I've
3 matches
Mail list logo
