RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses?

society then you'd probably give your software (based on mine) away too in which case there's no big difference between AFPL and GPL. Lionello Lunesu Bizzarrista Originale. MONDO BIZZARRO B.V. MARKT 22A . P.O. BOX 475 . 5600 AL EINDHOVEN . NETHERLANDS TEL +31(0)40-2960886 . FAX +31(0)40-2960881

RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses?

zzarro.com/MBFPL.html Hope this helps, Lionello Lunesu Bizzarrista Originale. MONDO BIZZARRO B.V. MARKT 22A P.O. BOX 475 5600 AL EINDHOVEN NETHERLANDS TEL +31(0)40-2960886 FAX +31(0)40-2960881 Visit us on the web: www.mondobizzarro.com Mondo Bizzarro: where pigs can fly!

RE: AFPL vs. GPL-like licenses?

Well, yeah! One big implication of using the AFPL instead of the GPL is "why should I contribute to your code when I am not allowed to profit off of it?" -- David Johnson You're still _using_ it. Whether you contribute or not. Lionello Lunesu Bizzarrista Originale. MONDO BI

RE: What license to pick...

The end is near. LER An alternative you might consider is the Aladdin Free Public License (AFPL). I found it at: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/aladdin/doc/Public.htm Thanks for the tip! It is what I've been looking for. Distribution is allowed but every change from the original Work must

RE: What license to pick...

OK, I'll 'share' my thoughts on all of these mails. : ) Thanks for all the helpful input by the way! I appreciate it! LL So we (my company) have decided to make our VR-toolkit open source! LL [...] LL AND we don't want other people to be able to create their LL own distribution of the toolkit.

What license to pick...

this. I've also looked at QPL (from Qt free edition) and it might be what we're looking for. Any ideas? Lionello Lunesu Mondo Bizzarro

Re: What license to pick...

Does the GPL allow us (the toolkit creators) to ask a fee for commercial use of our toolkit? L.