> If anything, GNOME is part of the "GNOME movement" - any other group
> trying to take credit for it or call it their own, should reconsider
> their position.
The "G" in GNOME stands for GNU. GNOME is part of the GNU project.
Just in case you had not noticed ;-)
Miguel.
I agree with Richard that GNOME should be classified of part of the
Free Software movement. We started this project to provide a free (in
the sense of freedom) user interface for the GNU project.
We are not working on GNOME because it is "economically" a good idea,
nor for any of the allegedly
> There was a time that the GNU/Linux system was not of "sufficiently high
> quality" to do much of anything useful. If that had been the deciding factor
> we would have never made it to this point.
Speak for yourself. I have been using GNU software and Linux since
its very early ages to do us
> One interesting implication of Brooks's Law is that as N (the number of
> developers) gets sufficiently large, the cost of management and
> coordination (which is a function of N^2) ends up exceeding the
> productivity of the developers (which is a function of N) and nobody
> produces anything
4 matches
Mail list logo
