I am the counsel to OSI. As Allison noted, most OSI approved licenses can be
used for inbound use, but we do not take a position on that issue in approving
licenses. Different communities have different approaches, the Apache Software
Foundation uses specific CLAs for its projects (and some pr
I agree. Even though I am outside GC for OSI, I think that these issues are
critical to ASF and should remain a decision made by ASF.
-Original Message-
From: license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org
[mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On Behalf Of Jim Jagielski
Sent: Tuesday,
I think that we have more than enough licenses with these characteristics.
From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On Behalf
Of Michael R. Bernstein
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 9:27 AM
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Short perm
I agree with McCoy. As outside General Counsel of the OSI for more than 10
years, the drafting of a new "open source" license requires strong reasons.
The reasons that I have seen in the list don't meet that standard. I strongly
recommend against trying to develop a new "open source" license.
I suggest using the Apache contribution license agreements rather than Apache
itself.
-Original Message-
From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On Behalf
Of Richard Fontana
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:04 AM
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject:
I agree with Ben. Lawyers with open source experience will dramatically
decrease your costs. You should also consider consulting Heather Meeker’s
book:
https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Business-Practical-Licensing/dp/1511617772/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480369990&sr=8-1&keywords=open+source+fo
ect usage, whereas:
http://www.yahoo.com/displaydate.js"</a>;>
would be a correct usage.
Is it correct ?
Thank you.
Cordialement, Best regards.
Etienne
De : License-discuss
[mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org>
nk you.
Cordialement, Best regards.
Etienne
De : License-discuss
[mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org>]
De la part de Radcliffe, Mark
Envoyé : lundi 28 novembre 2016 22:55
À : license-discuss@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss@op
8 matches
Mail list logo
