ome Web apps to help streamline the process and, more
importantly, to let people know the progress of their license, we would be
happy to volunteer to do some...scratching.
Raymond Luk, CEO
OpenDesk.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Brian Behlendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
al in November. I replied
but haven't heard from him yet.
I have about 50 programmers here ready to volunteer some time if OSI needs some
sort of application/database to help them out. Of course, we'd use only OSI
compliant tools :)
Let me know,
Raymond Luk
President
OPENDESK.COM
[
ker (which is the 'engine' of OpenDesk.com) will be released
LGPL.
Any comments would be appreciated, but please do not comment on
unhighlighted clauses as they are verbatim from APSL (i.e. that discussion
has already taken pl
ght, I
clearly cannot continue licensing the infringing code. Furthermore, *you*
may not be able to continue to use or redistribute the affected code
anyways, so Apple's right to withdraw its license may not be such a big
deal.
IMO, current Open Source licenses are vague regarding the results of
infringement suits on Open Source code.
Raymond Luk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed that the Apple Public Source License is not listed
among the OSI certified licenses. After initial community objections and Apple's
subsequent modifications on April 19, 1999, is the new license now OSI
certified?
Besides Bruce Perens' open letter, have there been any other
signi
does not 'infect' via mere aggregation and that LGPL
would cover apps if they were considered 'linked' to the API.
FYI, our intent is not to impose any restrictions on apps written using our
API. Just want to let developers know what they're getting into.
Thanks,
Ray
yebrows because it
sounds like SCSL. However, we do allow for incompatible forking. We simply
require that the branding is changed so it is obvious for end users that
they are using a different version of the software.]
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Raymond Luk
HBE Software Inc.
1030 St-Alex
7 matches
Mail list logo