Re: mysql

ot linked against it, which violates the GPL). Actually, what limits your hability to distribute your application is not MySQL AB, but the GPL itself. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to ea

Re: mysql

? Under which license if Mysql documentation distributed ? Now, a question for the lawyer in the list: if I use a GPL'd documentation (example: describing an API) to create a software, must my software also be licensed undes the GPL ? []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "

Re: Ethics (OT) (was Re: Antiwar License)

n not be a primary > one for me. Why don't you simply keep your software private. If you avoid distributing it, you can be 100% certain it will not be used to support war. As we said before, you can't enforce this kind of license. So, your only choise is to simply DON'T distribute you

Re: Antiwar License

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:52:21PM -0800, Sergey Goldgaber wrote: > --- Rodrigo Barbosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 08:19:12PM -0800, Sergey Goldgaber wrote: > > > Could a fee then be charged for military use or use by the > > Depar

Re: Antiwar License

> States Government for such use? Could such a license achieve OSI > Certification? You would be discriminating a group. So no, you would not get it OSI certified. -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG

Re: Antiwar License

the "war related" department are not only related to attacks, but also to defense. So, if you void these depatments from using your software, you may very well be making it difficult to them to SAVE lives. -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasi

Re: Antiwar License

ly matter ? Or would the militaries just declare national security is involved, and then ignore the license ? []s -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil "Quis custodiet ipsos cust

Re: UnitedLinux and "open source"

Aberto > already by a large margin. What do you mean ? That the expression "Software Livre" is more used then Código Aberto ? Well, actually, I do think it is true. And most people here have no idea what the difference is, let alone that there is a difference at all. []

Re: UnitedLinux and "open source"

en Source" in these languages. > > If the software is "livre", in spirit, it should be > libre whether it is in binary or source. I can share > binaries or source with my neighbor. > > > Holding the BINARIES is agains the spirit of open > > SOURCE ? >

Re: Executions for piracy

;government. Nah, they are being executed for dealing drugs (Celine Dion errr "music"). :-) []s -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" - http://www

Re: UnitedLinux and "open source"

ource is open, after all, isn't it ? -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS - Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" - http://www.tisbrasil.com.br/ Brainbench Certified -> Transcript ID #3332104 -- lic

Re: request for approval of APOSSL

s you to endorse and promote products. > > What interpretation do others make? I agree with your interpretation. The text states clearly that you MUST use it, unless you get permission for not using it. -- Rodrigo Barbosa - rodrigob at tisbrasil.com.br TIS

Multi-licensing

st go to the OSI site, and pick your favorite license ===LICENSE=== The point is, am I in any danger doing this ? Should I put, explicitily, any statement about "NO WARRANTIES", or the about statement is enough ? Thanks -- Rodrigo Barbosa

Please, review YA Public License

License mostly based on BSD License and GPL http://www.morcego.net/~rodrigob/yalicense.txt -- Rodrigo Barbosa - Network Administrator Liveware, Tecnologia a Servico LTDA - (+55)(35)471-3210 finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP Key and more info "Artificial Intelligence stands no chance ag