Re: license idea

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) For-profit organizations may re-distribute the software, however if they charge more than a reasonable distribution fee, they must pay royalties to the project. free as in speech? Not only individual are free to speech. Why

Re: license idea

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, Giacomo A. Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: 2) For-profit organizations may re-distribute the software, however if they charge more than a reasonable distribution fee, they must pay royalties to the project. [...] Surely not free (5: No

Re: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
of binaries with deployment of the software would be ideal. Would that work? Thanks, Ryo Chijiiwa -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that most agree that the requirement to give source and distribution rights to all users is an acceptible solution. Perhaps my interpretation of the GPL is incorrect, but I thought that was one of the basic requirements in that

Re: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andy Tai wrote: Maybe you are looking for is the AGPL, http://www.affero.org/oagpl.html I don't see this on the opensource.org list, and I hope not to. Debian has expressed objections to this license as well. IMO, this

Re: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryo Chijiiwa scripsit: On 7/16/2003, Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that most agree that the requirement to give source and distribution rights to all users is an acceptible solution. Perhaps my interpretation

Re: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
On 7/16/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Server software like web servers and mail servers don't have interfaces for end users because that's not the intended audience. Of course they are. End users use the http and smtp interfaces of such servers every day. They are

RE: license idea (revised)

2003-07-16 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
Thanks. The license was suggested to me off list by someone as well, and apart from FSF having issues with it (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html), it seems like it fulfills most of my needs. I'll present this to my users and see what they say. Thanks again to everyone for your

license idea

2003-07-15 Thread Ryo Chijiiwa
this conflict with the Open Source Definition? 3) Where can I get help writing licenses? Thanks, Ryo Chijiiwa ilohamail.org -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3