license.
Executive-Legislative action seems best to resolve pending questions.
Stephen Michael Kellat
On August 29, 2017 8:46:41 AM EDT, "Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)"
<cem.f.karan@mail.mil> wrote:
>Since I'm a Federal employee, and since putting together an
in Article II,
Section 3 of the federal constitution would work nicely.
Stephen Michael Kellat
On August 28, 2017 11:59:44 AM EDT, "Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)"
<cem.f.karan@mail.mil> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Fontana [ma
"Lawrence Rosen" <lro...@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
> Stephen Michael Kellat referred to his standard disclaimer at
> <http://skellat.freeshell.org/blog/pages/about-this-blog.html>
> http://skellat.freeshell.org/blog/pages/about-this-blog.html:
>
>
>
> Abou
the Army running an inquiry opened up in the Federal Register where the
public can comment and attorneys for the Army can respond probably will be
worthwhile. For as much as this list can be reactive, it is time for DoD and
Army to put their cards on the table for feedback.
Stephen Michael Kellat
4 matches
Mail list logo
