Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

2001-04-25 Thread Tom Oehser
here with bzip2, I get 51,200 bytes for BSD, GPL, and LGPL, tarred. That should be acceptable for a TRB distribution archive, no? It breaks one of the primary design goals, which is that the tarball can be created from the floppy and vice versa in a completely symetrical way, because

Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

2001-04-25 Thread Tom Oehser
Ok, thanks. By the way, I have as a result of these discussions made a bunch of enhancements to http://www.toms.net/rb/license.html, which is pretty difficult to accidentally avoid at this point, and which will be on all the mirrors tomorrow. I added a key of what license goes with which file

Re: tomsrtbt, 3rd draft...

2001-04-22 Thread Tom Oehser
It sounds for me it may be better you use the modified BSD-license for the software you have the complete rights for instead of create another license with much the same meaning. But, it *isn't* much the same meaning. The modified BSD-license says, Don't sue me or misuse my name

tomsrtbt, 3rd draft...

2001-04-22 Thread Tom Oehser
* * be so protected. For those components to which these restrictions cannot be * * applied, (i.e. under the GPL), construe the term "MUST" as "PRETTY PLEASE". * * You MUST credit tomsrtbt, mention http://www.toms.net/rb/ and [EMAIL PROTECTED], * * and include this entire not

Re: FW: tomsrtbt license, take 4

2001-04-22 Thread Tom Oehser
If you expect a court to take your license seriously when someone misuses ... protecting yourself from liability, then why don't you use one of the ... Really, neither. I have no intention of ever enforcing anything through a court, and I am not concerned about liability. Rather, I'm trying

Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

2001-04-22 Thread Tom Oehser
Did you add your own copyright notice to these programs? I'm digging around for copyright notices, they're a bit scarce You ought to be covered under GPL in this case. The GPL says: 4. You may not ... sublicense ... and: 6. ... You may not impose any further restrictions ... It

Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt?

2001-04-21 Thread Tom Oehser
What is it you want to protect? I'll give you an example. My bootdisk currently includes a libc5.so.5.4.13 that I have down to only 416,361 bytes. More than 2 years ago, back in October of 1998, I had it only down to 432,684 bytes. I havn't distributed that binary libc.so for about 2 years.

tomsrtbt license

2001-04-20 Thread Tom Oehser
it, or distribute customized versions of it: You must credit * * tomsrtbt and include a pointer to http://www.toms.net/rb/ and [EMAIL PROTECTED], * * and include this notice verbatim. Copyright Tom Oehser 1999. This notice in * * no way supercedes or nullifies any other protections on the component parts

Is this better for tomsrtbt?

2001-04-20 Thread Tom Oehser
it, or distribute customized versions of it, * * you must credit tomsrtbt, mention http://www.toms.net/rb/ and [EMAIL PROTECTED], * * and include this entire notice verbatim. Copyright Tom Oehser, 2001. Within * * these strictures you may freely redistribute, incorporate, copy, modify, or * * do