ull compliance with the license,
without paying the specified license fee.
Also wondering why you prohibit organizations that are neither
non-commercial ventures, nor commercial ventures from using your product.
jonathon
--
Email with a status of other than "ju
On 6/9/2014 10:11 PM, ldr ldr wrote:
"Yes, FullContentRSS is an AGPL3 script, you can use and/or modify the
script as you want. However you can get the script for $20."
>Is that congruent with the AGPL3 license?
Yes.
The primary reason most FLOSS is distributed gratis, is because FLOSS
li
closed source.
Some organizations use the CLA so that when license violations are
found, if the violator refuses to correct the problem, pursuing legal
remedies is much easier.
>The ambiguity has the effect of implying the second and obscuring the
first.
That ambiguity is why OSI should not eve
ds upon the specific legal issue(s) that are
being addressed.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUv0xUAAoJEE1PKy9+kxplAH4QAK0Qj4iwg62PugccKz5+NzuX
CLPHQjI2+yP1W1fOVJqr89MLp/vE0tcbH3MsL+2whuQVXKuy+NUwbikk70YmAI+F
UEqc84oQtSWccBDs/NHwCrzh9wyXq7mnllK8JNeRA4lR
to sell a DVD includes (c) and (p)
rights, as well as other, related rights. (Appellate Case Law: An offer
to sell, by necessity, includes all related rights to the item being
sold, regardless of whether or not they are enumerated, or even
mentioned, during
e the developer is unaware of possible patents.
Nor is it a case of where the developer holds any patents.
jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
follow that lawyer's advice.
IOW, release only after discussion with a neutral lawyer, and then only
if said lawyer approves.
Sounds good to me.
jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
License-discuss mailing lis
;
>or just shoot their patents down completely.
That costs US$10,000,000 per patent.
jonathon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
On 30/03/15 07:40, Tim Makarios wrote
> Publication Licence [1], which a more careful (automated) word-count measures
> at nearly 800 words.
Isn't the DWTFYL license shorter?
(I can't override the NSFW search on my browser, to find a copy of that
license.)
jonathon
signature
patents, but dam it, when somebody
has obtained a patent that is nothing more than a series of steps I
wrote, years before the patent was applied for, I'd like to know what it
says, especially since they didn't give me the courtesy of telling that
they were monetizing my non-invention.)
jo
eatened with lawsuits for patent
violations, copyright violations, and other intellectual property
violations, by parties who have never seen the allegedly infringing
vapourware.
jonathon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVZn/d
license.
^2: This is that planning/proposal/mockup stage. During coding, source
code licenses are verified to be what was expected, and what was adverti
sed.
jonathon
* English - detected
* English
* English
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGB
spend time verifying that the licenses are what
they were purported to be, and checked out as being, during the project
planning stage.
^1: I am aware of software that reads License and Notice files, to
determine that they conform with known, accepted, licenses. However,
that software can overlook
13 matches
Mail list logo
