-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/2015 21:54, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
At least in the open source community, let's please take advantage of
this relief provided us by the CAFC in Seagate. Open source engineers
should be free to read and write whatever they want about patents.
Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
Willful blindness (sometimes called ignorance of law, willful ignorance or
contrived ignorance or Nelsonian knowledge) is a term used in law to
describe a situation in which a person seeks to avoid civil or criminal
liability for a wrongful act by intentionally
[cross-posted to legal-discuss@apache and license-discuss@opensource]
[The below is my response to someone else's email on another list. It is
rather legal/technical, but some of you may now understand why I'm not as
afraid of patents as I used to be. I'd like to calm some of you down also
and
Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
I read the CAFC decision you referenced in
your email: SSL Services, LLC v. Citrix Systems
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9194570733323971805hl=enas_s
dt=6as_vis=1oi=scholarr , 769 F.3d 1073 (Fed Cir. 2014). Even though
willful damages were awarded
Elsewhere on internal Apache member email lists we've been discussing a
patent that may or may not apply to Apache software. I already quoted
publicly the strongly-held opinion of one Apache member that this patent is
just plain BS, IMHO. He may be right.
My concern is that Apache members are
5 matches
Mail list logo
