* Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com [2013-11-22 00:23]:
It seems that OSL 1.1, 2.0, and AFL 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 are not
accessible at http://opensource.org/licenses/[SPDX name]. As far as I
know/find, they have been approved.
Luis said in
[I've been on vacation, and/or preparing for vacation; apologies for
my slow responses here, which will continue through Sunday.]
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Engel Nyst engel.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the text intended to no longer be accessible?
As far as I know, this is not intentional;
]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:10 AM
To: License Discuss; Lawrence Rosen
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Issue on licenses pages
[I've been on vacation, and/or preparing for vacation; apologies for my slow
responses here, which will continue through Sunday.]
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:23 PM
-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: [License-discuss] Issue on licenses pages
Hello license-discuss,
It seems that OSL 1.1, 2.0, and AFL 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 are not accessible at
http://opensource.org/licenses/[SPDX name]. As far as I know/find, they have
been approved.
A number of discussions on OSI
Hello license-discuss,
It seems that OSL 1.1, 2.0, and AFL 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 are not
accessible at http://opensource.org/licenses/[SPDX name]. As far as I
know/find, they have been approved.
A number of discussions on OSI mailing lists archives reference their
approval.
They are also not
5 matches
Mail list logo
