ubject: Re: [License-discuss] Orphan Works: Summary of proposed 17 USC 514
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Michael R. Bernstein <mich...@fandomhome.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Ingo
> <henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi>
> wrote:
>> This i
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Michael R. Bernstein
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Ingo
> wrote:
>> This is interesting indeed. This is so unusual that I have to ask:
>> what is the political context that has given rise to
Michael R. Bernstein scripsit:
>2. Large holders and producers of copyrighted works will now be
>able to 'mine' orphan works for adaptation with little danger,
>creating new works that they can aggressively defend, and possibly
>will aggressively discourage others from making
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Ingo
wrote:
>
>
> This is interesting indeed. This is so unusual that I have to ask:
> what is the political context that has given rise to such a proposal
> that would make copyright law more sane, where usually all lobbying
>
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Michael R. Bernstein scripsit:
>
> >2. Large holders and producers of copyrighted works will now be
> >able to 'mine' orphan works for adaptation with little danger,
> >creating new works that they can
For those who don't want to read the entire report, below is a summary of draft
U.S. copyright legislation, 17 U.S.C. Sec. 514, "Limitation on remedies in
cases involving orphan works."
The orphan works problem is referred to as "perhaps the single greatest
impediment to creating new
Thanks Larry
This is interesting indeed. This is so unusual that I have to ask:
what is the political context that has given rise to such a proposal
that would make copyright law more sane, where usually all lobbying
effort is towards more and longer restrictions?
henrik
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at
7 matches
Mail list logo