Sorry, I now realize you were asking about the attribution requirement in
materials accompanying binary distributions. Just use BSD stamped into each
file & and include a waiver of the attribution requirements in the LICENSE
file, or stamp zlib into each file (it is shorter than BSD in any case).
I doubt it. The BSD license text itself stamped into each file would seem
to fulfil the attribution requirement. If you are concerned about this for
some reason, you can simply make that explicit in the LICENSE file.
IANAL, TINLA, etc.
- Michael Bernstein
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Sagar
permissive no attribution required open
source license
I doubt it. The BSD license text itself stamped into each file would seem to
fulfil the attribution requirement. If you are concerned about this for some
reason, you can simply make that explicit in the LICENSE file.
IANAL, TINLA, etc
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 11:56 +0530, Sagar wrote:
> Do you think the community will be interested in a shorter license?
You might be interested in the Free Public License, which is currently
under review on the license-review list [1], and has been recommended
for consideration by the OSI board
4 matches
Mail list logo
