Re: [License-discuss] The alphabetical list

2012-11-12 Thread Richard Fontana
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:19:17PM +0200, Henrik Ingo wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > > Heard loud and clear re usefulness of the alphabetical list; it will > > not go away. > > > > I'm surprised by that, so (in a different thread) I'd welcome more > > detail on what

Re: [License-discuss] The alphabetical list

2012-11-12 Thread Luis Villa
Ah, OK- this makes sense. I tend to just hit Google first to answer this question, but it is obviously a valid and sensible use case. Thanks for clarifying for me. On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote: > Same. I used it this way today when I was curious if the Code Project > Op

Re: [License-discuss] The alphabetical list

2012-11-12 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
Same. I used it this way today when I was curious if the Code Project Open License was OSI approved. It's not but is on the osrc top 20 list - I dunno if that is a bug or a feature...I assume there is some weird history given that the OSI is "below the fold" on their resource page and grouped with

[License-discuss] The alphabetical list

2012-11-12 Thread Henrik Ingo
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > Heard loud and clear re usefulness of the alphabetical list; it will > not go away. > > I'm surprised by that, so (in a different thread) I'd welcome more > detail on what people use it for. User story: Henrik needs to look up (or link to) th