On 06/02/2017 04:55, Tim Makarios wrote:
Okay, but if Carlos also distributes B, unchanged, then he's also a
distributor of B, but not an author of it. If B is released (and Carlos
distributes it) under, say, the Apache licence, then the Licensor is
disclaiming warranties of title and
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 13:40 +0100, Massimo Zaniboni wrote:
> On 20/01/2017 00:20, Tim Makarios wrote:
>
> > Or is there some legal theory by
> > which the copyright holders are considered to be the licensors, but the
> > distributor is considered to be the one to whom the waiver of warranty
>
On 20/01/2017 00:20, Tim Makarios wrote:
> Or is there some legal theory by
> which the copyright holders are considered to be the licensors, but the
> distributor is considered to be the one to whom the waiver of warranty
> applies?
From what I understood, the situation seems this:
* suppose
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 08:01 +, David Woolley wrote:
> More generally on this topic, the requirement to include the copyright
> and licence in the permissive licences is only really codifying best
> practice. That's especially true for open source derivatives, where the
> implied warranty
4 matches
Mail list logo
