tself in the
public domain and has presumably found a way to accept code
contributions.
Best,
-Karl
>> -Original Message-
>> From: for...@david-woolley.me.uk
>> Sent: Fri, 03 May 2013 10:26:34 +0100
>> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
>> Subject: Re: [Licen
Quoting David Woolley (for...@david-woolley.me.uk):
> There are no international conventions on public domain, so a public
> domain declaration in one country may not have any effect in
> another, whereas a copyright one would.
[...]
> You would be much better advised to use a short licence that
ay 2013 10:26:34 +0100
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] public domain recognition
>
> johann Sorel wrote:
>
>> I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in
>> 'public domain'.
>> I've read
Hello,
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
My concern is o
johann Sorel wrote:
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
Hello,
I'm searching for the best course of action to develop a project in 'public
domain'.
I've read the FAQ and different threads on PD and CC0 in the archive. Basicaly
the OSI do not recommand using PD/CCO. So ... I don't care, since it's the
right choice for my objective.
My concern is on
6 matches
Mail list logo