Re: Again - How To Break The GPL

2000-03-22 Thread David Johnson
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, cszigetv wrote: > The GPL is not specific on when the modifications have to be made > available, though I always assumed that it should happen simultaneously > with the binary distribution. The delay imposed by TurboLinux is not > much (2 months), but then again, next time so

RE: Again - How To Break The GPL

2000-03-22 Thread Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
IL PROTECTED] > Subject: Again - How To Break The GPL > > > > > At the end of this mail is part of an article from OS Opinion about > TurboLinux' delays the distribution of their modified code, while (as I > assume) they distribute binaries. > > The GPL is not spe

Re: Again - How To Break The GPL

2000-03-22 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:04:38 +0100 From: cszigetv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At the end of this mail is part of an article from OS Opinion about TurboLinux' delays the distribution of their modified code, while (as I assume) they distribute binaries. I assume they are distributing the

Again - How To Break The GPL

2000-03-22 Thread cszigetv
At the end of this mail is part of an article from OS Opinion about TurboLinux' delays the distribution of their modified code, while (as I assume) they distribute binaries. The GPL is not specific on when the modifications have to be made available, though I always assumed that it should happe