Terry Hancock wrote:
Is anyone familiar with this license and/or OSI's relationship to or
opinion of it?
The DSL was submitted for OSI approval last January; there has yet to
be a reply.
Like others had mentioned on this list around that time, it seems that
OSI might not be actively
Is anyone familiar with this license and/or OSI's
relationship to or opinion of it?
It purports to be a more appropriate "copyleft" license
for artistic work, much in the same spirit as the
GPL, but with some additional protection for the
artistic integrity of a work -- mainly that it forces
Terry Hancock wrote:
Is anyone familiar with this license and/or OSI's
relationship to or opinion of it?
A quick read over the license suggests that it is OSD-compliant;
it is very close to the GPL and the Artistic License.
Opinion? Comments? Flames? :)
Disclaimer: IANAOSImember.
--
3 matches
Mail list logo
