The LPL lets you redistribute with GPL if you want. You would
have to keep the copyright. Also, the distributor agrees to
indemnify the contributors against suits due to his actions,
which might scare some people off.
Distributing separately with both the LPL and the GPL is also possible.
Our i
attached files.
Randy Wrote:
---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Framework Licensing for Developer Flexibility
Our company has been using a commercial development
environment that
provides the infrastructure for developing interactive web
Randy Pearson scripsit:
> 3. The Modfied BSD and/or MIT license appear to be the closest to what we
> are looking for.
If you want to ensure that your framework remains open source -- in
particular, that any improvements made to it are available to you --
then I recommend the Mozilla Public Lice
Hello Randy,
I generally dislike the BSD licenses, since they allow incompatible
propietary modifications. If you are not confortable with the LGPL, you
might want to consider the SISSL (Sun Industry Standard License).
OpenOffice.org is distributed under a dual LGPL/SISSL system:
http://www.o
Our company has been using a commercial development environment that
provides the infrastructure for developing interactive web applications.
Over several years, we have developed an object-oriented framework that can
be used in conjunction with the commercial product, and greatly enhances
develope
5 matches
Mail list logo
