Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread Rick Moen
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation: > You can find historic versions of the Linux_ kernel at > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/ > > The archive may be incomplete -- I see an 0.99.x and 0.96[abc]. No > 0.97. It's in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/old-versions/o

Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread kmself
on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 07:38:20PM +0100, Sven Dehmlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, to ask Linus is a good idea, but it only makes sense if Linus answers > and I'm not sure about that... You're not going to find that out writing here. If Linus doesn't respond, I'd go to Linux International

Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread Sven Dehmlow
Well, to ask Linus is a good idea, but it only makes sense if Linus answers and I'm not sure about that... Sven

Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread kmself
on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:39:00PM +0100, Sven Dehmlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > I develop a kernel basing on Linux 0.97, so I need to know which license it > has. Ask Linus. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.

Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread Sven Dehmlow
Hi, I develop a kernel basing on Linux 0.97, so I need to know which license it has. Bye Sven

Re: Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-31 Thread kmself
on Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:23:19PM +0100, Sven Dehmlow privat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > Linux 1.0 is under GPL, of course. But is Linux 0.1 is under Linus' "own" > license. Is Linux 0.97 under GPL? You can find historic versions of the Linux_ kernel at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/ke

Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

2000-10-29 Thread Sven Dehmlow privat
Hi, Linux 1.0 is under GPL, of course. But is Linux 0.1 is under Linus' "own" license. Is Linux 0.97 under GPL? Sven