Re: OSD #1 proposed change

2001-11-18 Thread Chris D. Sloan
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:11:41PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:58:54AM -0500, Forrest J. Cavalier III >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > Currently OSD #1 reads: > > The license shall not restrict any party from selling > >

Re: OSD #1 proposed change

2001-11-14 Thread phil hunt
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 10:11 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:58:54AM -0500, Forrest J. Cavalier III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Currently OSD #1 reads: > > The license shall not restrict any party from selling > > or giving away the software

OSD #1 proposed change

2001-11-13 Thread Forrest J. Cavalier III
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > It still makes a _wonderful_ manifesto, its success speaks for that. But to > apply it blindly would be foolhardy. I imagine that there is an unbounded set > of licenses that appear to be OSD-compliant yet are so pernicious in their > terms as to be outside of th