RMS has considered attaching requirements to "public performance" in the next
version of the GPL. Copyright law addresses public performance, and that could
be made to fit presentation on a web server, etc.
From: Andrew J Bromage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Modern techniques of application serving and
At 11:28 AM 11/8/99 +1100, Andrew J Bromage wrote:
> > 2) Commercial Use for Private Installations (e.g. installing OpenDesk on an
> > Intranet)
> > a) Modifications to Covered Code must be released under this license.
> >
> > The GPL does that.
>
>No it doesn't.
>
>If you install a modified ver
G'day all.
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 02:17:47AM +0100, Philipp Gühring wrote:
> 2) Commercial Use for Private Installations (e.g. installing OpenDesk on an
> Intranet)
> a) Modifications to Covered Code must be released under this license.
>
> The GPL does that.
No it doesn't.
If you install
>Any feedback would be appreciated.
Wouldn´t it be enough to use the GPL instead of the ODPL?
Others can reuse the GPLed code in GPLed products.
> The intent is to protect
>OpenDesk.com developers, who want to contribute to a free, Open
>Source project. It does this by requiring that any code th
-side applications.
OPENDESK.COM LICENSE PROPOSAL
BACKGROUND
SmartWorker is an application framework and set of mod_perl classes for
building apps.
OpenDesk.com is a collection of SmartWorker applications designed to work
within a Web portal environment.
SMARTWORKER LICENSE
Core techn
5 matches
Mail list logo
