David Johnson writes:
> At one time there was talk about Open Source certification. Is this
> still being considered? A trademark may not be possible, but a
> certification would be the next best thing.
We had always planned on registering Open Source as a certification
mark. In fact, such an
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Anyway, it's all a moot point since we've stopped defending "Open
> Source". As one of the people on the front line of the trademark
> defense, I can tell you that it was hopeless. If you have a different
> opinion, I have to wonder what evidence you
Ean R . Schuessler writes:
> My understanding is that the validity of trademarks stands on an
> organization's consistent use and regular defense of a term in the course
> of commerce. The longer this mark stands formally unchallenged, the more
> difficult it will become to unseat it. If this
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> My understanding is that the validity of trademarks stands on an
> organization's consistent use and regular defense of a term in the course
> of commerce. The longer this mark stands formally unchallenged, the more
> difficult it will become to un
My understanding is that the validity of trademarks stands on an
organization's consistent use and regular defense of a term in the course
of commerce. The longer this mark stands formally unchallenged, the more
difficult it will become to unseat it. If this company develops products,
packaging,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> I don't know how many of you are aware of this, but I must have missed any
> discussion that occured on it. It appears that our lack of action on an
> Open Source trademark (bickering, bad communication, et. al) has created
> a serious problem. A c
6 matches
Mail list logo
