Well CUAPL it's base on MPL and I think nothing to chage within my license
except when the situation is force me to change it.
Patranun Limudomporn
Project Leader
CUA Office Project
From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Update for CUA
Patranun Limudomporn said on Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:09:15PM +0700,:
> Well, John just like Sun Public License case. It's same with my
> case but SPL add more information about documentation. Our project
> prefer to use our own license. We've been use LGPL before and then
> we think it i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Update for CUA Office Public License
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:39:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from ns1.crynwr.com ([192.203.178.14]) by mc2-f7.hotmail.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:47:55 -0800
Received
Hi Everyone
With regard to the MPL there is one new element that probably isn't
well known. There is a section of the MPL that says who can modify the
MPL. The 1.0 and 1.1 versions specify that entity as netscape (it had
to be someone). But with the creation of the Mozilla Foundation that
entit
Patranun Limudomporn scripsit:
> PS. If you want to compare and know what difference between CPL and MPL,
> just have a look at
> http://cuaoffice.sourceforge.net/productinfo_cpl_diff.htm
Thank you for providing this diff.
What it amounts to is that your CPL *is* the MPL 1.1 with the name change
Dear all of yours,
I've inform all of yours before that I found my mistakes in CUA Office
Public License so; this is a no mistakes version and it's for OSI approval
too (I don't want to use the mistakes one, it's make me and you confuse.)
Regards,
Patranun Limudomporn
Project Leader
CUA Office Pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
